KnowMesh
← Back to search

Monika Szymanska

Stress Engineer — Dynamics · Structural Analysis

Warsaw, Poland

Stress Engineer specializing in structural dynamics of rotating and non-rotating aerospace components. Performs modal, harmonic response, and random vibration analyses for engine components and avionic brackets. Experienced in experimental correlation using test data from vibration rigs and ground vibration tests.

Expertise

  • modal analysis
  • harmonic response analysis
  • random vibration
  • Campbell diagram
  • test-analysis correlation

Technologies

ANSYS Mechanical ANSYS Workbench MSC Nastran LMS Test.Lab MATLAB Excel HyperMesh

Work History

2025-02

Mistuning analysis of HPT bladed disk — intentional mistuning pattern optimization to reduce forced response amplification factor below 1.3 (target), using sector FEM with cyclic symmetry.

Challenge: Cyclic symmetry analysis assumes tuned (identical) sectors. Mistuning breaks this assumption — required full 360-degree model with individually perturbed blade properties. Full model had 8M DOF; solved overnight on HPC cluster.

Learned: Even small mistuning (±0.5% frequency scatter) can amplify forced response by factors of 2-3 in unlucky engine orders. Intentional mistuning can counteract this but requires careful optimization of the pattern.

ANSYS Mechanical MATLAB Python

2024-08

Test-analysis correlation using frequency response functions from vibration rig test — measured FRF with LMS Test.Lab vs predicted FRF from ANSYS, MAC matrix and FRAC values for mode pairing.

Challenge: Several measured modes had MAC values < 0.7 against predicted modes — unacceptable for certification correlation. Root cause: missing bolted joint contact in the FEM. Adding friction contact at all bolted interfaces improved MAC to > 0.85 for all modes.

Learned: Bolted joints are the primary source of discrepancy between FEM and test modal results. Modeling them as rigidly connected is almost always non-conservative. At minimum, use spring elements with calibrated stiffness.

LMS Test.Lab ANSYS Mechanical MATLAB Excel

2024-03

Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) for large engine assembly — each major component reduced to Craig-Bampton superelement, assembled for system-level modal analysis. Reduced model from 4M DOF to 12K DOF.

Challenge: Superelement interface DOF selection is critical — too few interface modes and the reduced model is inaccurate at component boundaries. Ran convergence study with 20, 40, and 80 interface modes to identify minimum required set.

Learned: CMS accuracy depends on correctly identifying which interface DOFs are dynamically active. Static condensation interface modes are mandatory; the number of dynamic interface modes is problem-specific.

MSC Nastran Patran MATLAB

2023-10

Random vibration analysis for avionic box qualification — input PSD from DO-160G profile, output acceleration PSD at mounting points, 3-sigma stress for fatigue damage assessment.

Challenge: The spectral density response was dominated by a mode that fell exactly at the PSD breakpoint — small errors in frequency prediction caused large changes in spectral response. Required test correlation before relying on fatigue predictions.

Learned: Random vibration fatigue using Miles equation assumes narrowband response. For broadband excitation with multiple contributing modes, the more conservative Dirlik method gives more accurate fatigue damage estimates.

ANSYS Mechanical ANSYS Workbench Excel

2023-05

Harmonic response analysis of engine mount bracket — swept frequency 20 to 2000 Hz, peak response identification, fatigue assessment at maximum acceleration location.

Challenge: Modal damping was unknown — used assumed damping ratio of 2% initially. Sensitivity study showed that the peak response at 847 Hz was very sensitive to damping: 1% vs 3% damping changed peak stress by 3x. Escalated to get measured damping from test.

Learned: Harmonic response results are extremely sensitive to damping near resonance. Assumed damping values must be conservative (low) and sensitivity studies are mandatory when test-measured damping is unavailable.

ANSYS Mechanical ANSYS Workbench Excel

2023-01

Modal analysis of fan blade assembly — extracted first 20 mode shapes and natural frequencies, constructed Campbell diagram to identify potential resonance crossings with engine excitation orders (EO1-EO24).

Challenge: Two bending modes were within 5% of each other in frequency and had similar mode shapes — difficult to assign labels (1F vs 2F) unambiguously. Used Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) matrix to establish mode tracking across operating speeds.

Learned: Campbell diagram resonance crossings must be assessed against the mode shape, not just the frequency. A crossing at low excitation amplitude is benign; the same crossing with high aerodynamic forcing is a design concern.

ANSYS Mechanical MATLAB Excel